Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 14, Number 4—April 2008
Dispatch

Human Thelaziasis, Europe

Figures
Tables
Article Metrics
107
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: *University of Bari, Bari, Italy; †Croce and Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy

Cite This Article

Abstract

Thelazia callipaeda eyeworm is a nematode transmitted by drosophilid flies to carnivores in Europe. It has also been reported in the Far East in humans. We report T. callipaeda infection in 4 human patients in Italy and France.

Nematodes transmitted by arthropods may cause diseases of different severity, especially in developing countries (1). Among these nematodes, Thelazia callipaeda Railliet and Henry, 1910 (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) has received little attention. Commonly referred to as eyeworm, it infects orbital cavities and associated tissues of humans, carnivores (i.e., dogs, cats, and foxes), and rabbits (2). Because of its distribution in the former Soviet Union and in countries in the Far East, including the People’s Republic of China, South Korea, Japan, Indonesia, Thailand, Taiwan, and India (2) it has been known as oriental eyeworm. T. callipaeda infection is endemic in poor communities in Asia, particularly in China (3), where it is frequently reported as being responsible for human thelaziasis with mild to severe symptoms (including lacrimation, epiphora, conjunctivitis, keratitis, and corneal ulcers) (4).

A second species, T. californiensis Price, 1930, has been reported to infect humans in the United States (2). Infective third-stage larvae of eyeworm are transmitted by insects that feed on lacrimal secretions of infected animals and humans that contain Thelazia spp. first-stage larvae. In the vector T. callipaeda, first-stage larvae undergo 3 molts (≈14–21 days), and infective third-stage larvae may be transmitted to a new receptive host and develop into the adult stage in ocular cavities within ≈35 days (5). Competence of drosophilid flies of the genus Phortica as vectors of T. callipaeda has been recently demonstrated (68).

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Massive Thelazia callipaeda eye infection in a dog.

Figure 1. Massive Thelazia callipaeda eye infection in a dog.

Ocular infection of carnivores by T. callipaeda has been reported in France (9). This infection is also common in dogs (Figure 1) and cats in Italy (10). Imported carnivore cases of thelaziasis have also been reported in Germany, the Netherlands, and Switzerland (11). The number of case reports of human thelaziasis has increased in several areas of Asia (3), where it occurs predominantly in rural communities with poor living and socioeconomic standards and mainly affects the elderly and children. In spite of increasing reports of T. callipaeda infection in carnivores in different European countries, no human cases have been described. Thus, infection with this eyeworm is unknown to most physicians and ophthalmologists.

We report autochthonous cases of human thelaziasis in Europe. We sought to raise awareness in the scientific community of the risk for disease caused by this parasite and the need to include this infection in the differential diagnosis of ocular diseases.

The Study

From June 2005 through August 2006, a total of 4 patients with human thelaziasis were referred to the Department of Emergency and Admissions at Croce and Carle Hospital in Cuneo, Italy, for consultation. The 4 male patients (age range 37–65 years) lived in northwestern Italy (43°N, 6°E) and southeastern France (46°N, 9°E), where infections had been reported in dogs, cats, and foxes (9,12). All patients had similar symptoms (exudative conjunctivitis, lacrimation, and foreign body sensation) for a few days to weeks before referral (Table). All patients required medical attention during the summer (June–August 2005 and 2006) and reported floating filaments on the eye surface. A medical history was obtained for 3 of the patients. The other patient (patient 2, a homeless man) was referred to a physician at the local social services in Nice, France, for severe mental disorders, poor hygiene, and diabetes (Table). Infections in patient 2 were diagnosed 1 month apart in each eye (June and July 2005; referred to as patient 2a and 2b). None of the patients had had any eye disease or had traveled outside their area of residence, with the exception of patient 1 who had gone trekking in the woods in Tenda (Piedmont region, Italy) ≈3 weeks before the onset of symptoms.

Eye examinations showed thin, white nematode(s) on the conjunctival fornix of the affected eye. Nematodes were removed with a forceps after local anesthesia (1% novocaine) was administered. The nematodes were stored in 70% ethanol until they were morphologically identified and analyzed. After the parasites were removed from the eyes, antimicrobial eye drops were prescribed for ≈7 days. Ocular symptoms disappeared within 2–3 days.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of A) Female Thelazia callipaeda isolated from patient 4. The posterior end is on the left and the anterior end is on the right (magnification × 200). Scale bar = 500 μm. B) T. callipaeda mature first-stage larvae in the distal uterus (magnification ×100). Scale bar = 30 μm.

Figure 2. A) Female Thelazia callipaeda isolated from patient 4. The posterior end is on the left and the anterior end is on the right (magnification × 200). Scale bar = 500 μm....

Collected nematodes were identified based on morphologic keys (13,14). T. callipaeda nematodes have a serrated cuticle (Figure 2, panel A), buccal capsule, mouth opening with a hexagonal profile, and 6 festoons. Adult females are characterized by the position of the vulva, located anterior to the esophagus-intestinal junction, whereas males have 5 pairs of postcloacal papillae. To confirm morphologic identification, specimens from patients 2 and 4 were analyzed as previously described (11). Genomic DNA was isolated from each nematode, and a partial sequence of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1, 689 bp) gene was amplified by PCR. Amplicons were purified by using Ultrafree-DA columns (Amicon; Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) and sequenced by using an ABI-PRISM 377 system and a Taq DyeDeoxyTerminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Sequences were determined in both directions and aligned by using the ClustalX program (15). Alignments were verified visually and compared with sequences available for the cox1 gene of T. callipaeda (GenBank accession nos. AM042549–556).

A total of 6 adult nematodes were morphologically identified as T. callipaeda (Table). A mature female nematode (patient 4) had embryonated eggs in the proximal uterus and larvae in the distal uterus (Figure 2, panel B). This suggested that a male worm was present, which had been rubbed out of the eye before symptoms occurred or had remained undetected. Sequences obtained from nematodes were identical to the sequence of haplotype 1 of T. callipaeda (GenBank accession no. AM042549) (11).

Conclusions

We report human infection by T. callipaeda in Italy and France in the same area where canine thelaziasis had been reported. These infections highlight the importance of including this arthropod-borne disease in the differential diagnoses of bacterial or allergic conjunctivitis. All cases of human thelaziasis were reported during the summer months (June–August), which is the period of T. callipaeda vector activity (late spring to fall in southern Europe) (7). The seasonality of human thelaziasis may impair correct etiologic diagnosis of this disease because spring and summer are the seasons in which allergic conjunctivitis (e.g., by pollens) occurs most frequently. This finding is particularly important when infections are caused by small larval stages that are difficult to detect and identify. Furthermore, clinical diagnosis of human thelaziasis is difficult if only small numbers of nematodes are present because clinical signs related to an inflammatory response mimic allergic conjunctivitis, especially when they are associated with developing third- or fourth-stage larvae.

Untimely or incorrect treatment of the infection may result in a delay in recovery, mainly in children and the elderly, who are most likely to be exposed to infection by the fly. Although treatment for canine infection with T. callipaeda with topical organophosphates, 1% moxidectin, or a formulation containing 10% imidacloprid and 2.5% moxidectin is effective, mechanical removal of parasites in humans remains the only curative option (3). Thus, prevention of human thelaziasis should include control of the fly vector by use of bed nets to protect children while they are sleeping and by keeping their faces and eyes clean. Genetic identification of haplotype 1 has shown that this is the only haplotype circulating in animals (i.e., dogs, cats, and foxes) in Europe (11). This finding confirms the metazoonotic potential of Thelazia spp. infection and the need to treat infected domestic animals, which may act as reservoirs for human infection.

Dr Otranto is professor in the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine of Bari, Italy. His primary research interests include biology and control of arthropod vector-borne diseases of animals and humans.

Mr Dutto is an entomologist and consultant at the Hospital Department of Emergency and Admissions, Croce and Carle Hospital in Cuneo, Italy. His primary interests include diagnosis of human diseases caused by arthropods.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank Riccardo Lia for assistance in preparing the figures.

Top

References

  1. Molyneux DH, Taylor MJ. Current status and future prospects of the Global Lymphatic Filariasis Programme.Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2001;14:1559. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson RC. Nematode parasites of vertebrates: their development and transmission. 2nd ed. Guilford (UK): CABI Publishing; 2000. p. 404–5.
  3. Shen J, Gasser RB, Chu D, Wang ZX, Yuan X, Cantacessi C, Human thelaziosis: a neglected parasitic disease of the eye.J Parasitol. 2006;92:8725. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Otranto D, Traversa D. Thelazia eyeworm: an original endo and ecto- parasitic nematode.Trends Parasitol. 2005;21:14. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Otranto D, Lia RP, Buono V, Traversa D, Giangaspero A. Biology of Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) eyeworms in naturally infected definitive hosts.Parasitology. 2004;129:62733. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Otranto D, Lia RP, Cantacessi C, Testini G, Troccoli A, Shen JL, The intermediate host of Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) in Europe and China: nematode biology and larval development inside the vector.Parasitology. 2005;131:84755. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Otranto D, Cantacessi C, Testini G, Lia RP. Phortica variegata is an intermediate host of Thelazia callipaeda under natural conditions: evidence for pathogen transmission by a male arthropod vector.Int J Parasitol. 2006;36:116773. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang ZX, Hu Y, Shen JL, Wang HY, Jiang BL, Zhao P, Longitudinal investigation and experimental studies on thelaziasis and the intermediate host of Thelazia callipaeda in Guanghua county of Hubei province.[in Chinese]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi.2003;24:58890.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Dorchies P, Chaudieu G, Simeon LA, Cazalot G, Cantacessi C, Otranto D. First reports of autochthonous eyeworm infection by Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) in dogs and cat from France.Vet Parasitol. 2007;149:2947. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Otranto D, Ferroglio E, Lia RP, Traversa D, Rossi L. Current status and epidemiological observation of Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) in dogs, cats and foxes in Italy: a “coincidence” or a parasitic disease of the old continent?Vet Parasitol. 2003;116:31525. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Otranto D, Testini G, Deluca F, Hu M, Shamsi S, Gasser RB. Analysis of genetic variability within Thelazia callipaeda (Nematoda: Thelazioidea) from Europe and Asia by sequencing and mutation scanning of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1.Mol Cell Probes. 2005;19:30613. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rossi L, Bertaglia P. Presence of Thelazia callipaeda Railliet & Henry, 1910, in Piedmont, Italy.Parassitologia. 1989;31:16772.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Skrjabin KI, Sobolev AA, Ivashkin VM. Family Thelaziidae Skrjabin 1915. Skrjabin KI, editor. Thelazioidea, essentials of nematology. Moscow: Akademii Nauk SSSR; 1967. p. 24–32.
  14. Otranto D, Lia RP, Traversa D, Giannetto S. Thelazia callipaeda (Spirurida, Thelaziidae) of carnivores and humans: morphological study by light and scanning electron microscopy.Parassitologia. 2003;45:12533.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. The Clustal_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools.Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:487682. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1404.071205

Table of Contents – Volume 14, Number 4—April 2008

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Domenico Otranto, Department of Veterinary Public Health, University of Bari, Strada per Casamassima Km 3, 70010 Valenzano, Bari, Italy;

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: July 14, 2010
Page updated: July 14, 2010
Page reviewed: July 14, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external