Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 30, Number 5—May 2024
Research Letter

Detection of Influenza D Antibodies in Dogs, Apulia Region, Italy, 2016 and 2023

Author affiliations: University of Siena, Siena, Italy (C.M. Trombetta, S. Marchi, M.G. Marotta, E. Montomoli); VisMederi Research srl, Siena (C.M. Trombetta, E. Montomoli); Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia-Romagna, Brescia, Italy (A. Moreno, C. Chiapponi); VisMederi srl, Siena (E. Montomoli); University of Bari, Valenzano, Italy (G. Lanave, M. Camero, V. Martella)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Dogs are known to be susceptible to influenza A viruses, although information on influenza D virus (IDV) is limited. We investigated the seroprevalence of IDV in 426 dogs in the Apulia region of Italy during 2016 and 2023. A total of 14 samples were positive for IDV antibodies, suggesting exposure to IDV in dogs.

Influenza D virus (IDV) was first identified from swine exhibiting influenza-like symptoms in 2011 in the United States (1). IDV RNA or antibodies have been detected worldwide in several animal hosts, including cattle, swine, small ruminants, camelids, and wild ungulates, although cattle are the main reservoir (2).

Because of social interactions, dogs are known to occasionally transmit pathogens to humans. In addition to being susceptible to canine influenza A viruses, dogs seem susceptible to common human influenza viruses and to avian viruses. Antibodies to influenza C virus (ICV) have been reported, suggesting that dogs may be naturally infected by ICV (3). However, information on the susceptibility of dogs to IDV is lacking.

We estimated the seroprevalence of IDV in household adult dogs on a total of 426 serum samples collected in 2016 (n = 169) and in 2023 (n = 257) in the Apulia region, Italy. The samples were collected by veterinary offices either for presurgical evaluation (n = 361) or for routine analysis (n = 65). We tested the samples in duplicate by using a hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay against 2 IDV strains, D/bovine/Oklahoma/660/2013 (D/660 lineage; (provided by Prof. Feng Li, University of Kentucky) and D/swine/Italy/199724–3/2015 (D/OK lineage; obtained from the European Virus Archive). We tested the HI-positive samples and a subset of negative samples by virus neutralization (VN) assay. We analyzed the IDV-positive samples collected in 2023 for the presence of ICV antibodies (human influenza C/human/Victoria/2/2012 virus; provided by Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia), although the 2016 samples could not be screened because of the limited residual volume (Appendix Figure 1). We considered an IDV antibody titer >10 a positivity cutoff for the HI and VN assays (4).

Our screening of the 2016 samples for HI (Table 1) resulted in 2 samples (2/169; 1.2% [95% CI 0.05%–4.5%]) testing positive for the D/660 lineage. One of the 2 samples (1/169; 0.6% [95% CI 0.0%–3.6%]) was also positive for the D/OK lineage by HI. Only the sample with double HI reactivity was also positive in the VN assay. For the samples collected in 2023, a total of 12 samples (12/257; 4.7% [95% CI 2.6%–8.1%]) were positive for D/660 lineage by HI, and none of the samples were positive for D/OK lineage (Table 2). The 2023 samples positive for HI were also tested in VN, and only 5 serum samples (41.7%) possessed neutralizing antibodies for D/660 lineage. The HI titers of the positive samples ranged from 10 to 160. The VN titers of the positive samples ranged from 10 to 80 (Table 2). Five of the 12 HI-positive samples tested positive for antibodies against ICV (Table 2).

Our findings provide evidence of dog exposure to IDV at a low prevalence. Because most animals were household dogs, the source of exposure remains uncertain. Because our study was based on serologic investigations, any correlation between IDV infection and clinical signs in dogs could not be inferred. IDV infection in horses is subclinical, whereas in other animal species, IDV is associated with respiratory disease (5). Our findings are also partially in line with surveillance data from Europe and Italy suggesting the emergence of a D/660-like clade after the mid-2010s (6). In our study, none of the samples collected in 2023 reacted against D/OK, likely reflecting the epidemiology of IDV in susceptible animals in the Apulia region.

Although phylogenetic analyses have suggested that IDV is more closely related to ICV (≈53% homology of hemagglutinin-esterase fusion protein) than to influenza A and B viruses, no cross-reactivity was observed between IDV and human ICV by HI assay (79). To assess this potential issue caused by the genetic relatedness between IDV and ICV, the IDV-positive samples were also tested for ICV, and 5 samples did react against ICV. Four samples showed HI titers higher for ICV than for IDV, suggesting the possibility of cross-reactivity between IDV and ICV. Other serologic studies have investigated the antibody prevalence of IDV and ICV in animal populations (810), showing that serum reactivity in HI can vary among different IDV lineages and possibly between IDV and ICV. The combination of HI and VN assays may represent a good proxy of IDV circulation in animal hosts.

Our findings indicate that household dogs are exposed to IDV, potentially acting as a source of infection for humans. Although IDV does not seem to cause major forms of illness in humans and currently IDV is not regarded as an important public health threat, the possibility that some IDV strains may acquire the ability to evolve and adapt in the human host should not be disregarded. This potential risk could be higher in settings where there is more viral pressure, such as in groups with occupational exposure.

Dr. Trombetta is an associate professor of hygiene and public health at the University of Siena. Her primary research interests include zoonotic viruses, infectious disease, and vaccine-preventable diseases.

Top

Acknowledgments

This publication was supported by the European Virus Archive GLOBAL project that received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement no. 871029).

Author contributions: conceptualization (C.M.T. and M.C.); formal analysis (S.M.); investigation (S.M. and M.G.M.); resources (C.M.T., G.L., M.C., and V.M.); data curation (S.M.); writing, original draft preparation (C.M.T. and V.M.); writing, review and editing (C.M.T., S.M., M.G.M., A.M., C.C., E.M., G.L., M.C., and V.M.); supervision (C.M.T. and S.M.); project administration (C.M.T.); and funding acquisition (C.M.T.).

Conflicts of interest: C.M.T. is an external consultant of VisMederi Research srl. E.M. is founder and chief scientific officer of VisMederi srl and VisMederi Research srl.

Top

References

  1. Hause  BM, Ducatez  M, Collin  EA, Ran  Z, Liu  R, Sheng  Z, et al. Isolation of a novel swine influenza virus from Oklahoma in 2011 which is distantly related to human influenza C viruses. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003176. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gaudino  M, Moreno  A, Snoeck  CJ, Zohari  S, Saegerman  C, O’Donovan  T, et al. Emerging Influenza D virus infection in European livestock as determined in serology studies: Are we underestimating its spread over the continent? Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021;68:112535. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Manuguerra  JC, Hannoun  C. Natural infection of dogs by influenza C virus. Res Virol. 1992;143:199204. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Saegerman  C, Salem  E, Ait Lbacha  H, Alali  S, Zouagui  Z, Meyer  G, et al. Formal estimation of the seropositivity cut-off of the hemagglutination inhibition assay in field diagnosis of influenza D virus in cattle and estimation of the associated true prevalence in Morocco. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2021;68:13929. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Sreenivasan  CC, Uprety  T, Reedy  SE, Temeeyasen  G, Hause  BM, Wang  D, et al. Experimental infection of horses with influenza D virus. Viruses. 2022;14:661. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gaudino  M, Chiapponi  C, Moreno  A, Zohari  S, O'Donovan  T, Quinless  E, et al. Evolutionary and temporal dynamics of emerging influenza D virus in Europe (2009–22). Virus Evol. 2022;8(2):veac08.
  7. Trombetta  CM, Montomoli  E, Di Bartolo  I, Ostanello  F, Chiapponi  C, Marchi  S. Detection of antibodies against influenza D virus in swine veterinarians in Italy in 2004. J Med Virol. 2022;94:28559. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Nedland  H, Wollman  J, Sreenivasan  C, Quast  M, Singrey  A, Fawcett  L, et al. Serological evidence for the co-circulation of two lineages of influenza D viruses in equine populations of the Midwest United States. Zoonoses Public Health. 2018;65:e14854. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Trombetta  CM, Marchi  S, Manini  I, Kistner  O, Li  F, Piu  P, et al. Influenza D virus: serological evidence in the Italian population from 2005 to 2017. Viruses. 2019;12:30. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Salem  E, Cook  EAJ, Lbacha  HA, Oliva  J, Awoume  F, Aplogan  GL, et al. Serologic evidence for influenza C and D virus among ruminants and camelids, Africa, 1991–2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:15569. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid3005.231401

Original Publication Date: April 12, 2024

Table of Contents – Volume 30, Number 5—May 2024

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Claudia Maria Trombetta, Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, University of Siena, Aldo Moro 2, 53100, Siena, Italy

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: March 22, 2024
Page updated: April 24, 2024
Page reviewed: April 24, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external