Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 29, Number 9—September 2023
Dispatch

Laboratory Diagnosis of Mpox, Central African Republic, 2016–2022

Author affiliations: Institut Pasteur de Bangui, Bangui, Central African Republic (S. Garba-Ouangole, F. Mbrenga, E. Gonofio, C. Malaka, Y. Boum II, E. Nakouné); International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium, Pandemic Sciences Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK (J. Bourner); Ministry of Health and Population, Bangui (B. Selekon, A. Manirakiza, E. Kalthan)

Cite This Article

Abstract

During 2016–2022, PCR testing confirmed 100 mpox cases among 302 suspected cases in the Central African Republic. The highest detection rates were from active lesions (40%) and scabs (36%); cycle thresholds were lower (≈18) than those for blood samples (≈33). Results were consistent for generic primer– and clade I primer–specific PCR tests.

Mpox is caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), a double-stranded DNA orthopoxvirus with 2 known clades: clade I (formerly Congo Basin or Central African clade); and clade II (formerly West African clade), which encompasses 2 subclades (IIa and IIb) (13). Cases of mpox have been identified in the Central African Republic (CAR) since 2001 and have increased over time (4). The growing number of cases can be explained by the widening geographic spread of the disease and intensified case-finding activities (5). However, official figures probably underestimate the incidence of mpox, which principally occurs in remote areas, where many cases may go undetected because of a lack of diagnostic capacity.

The Ministry of Health and Population set up a passive surveillance program for mpox in 2010. Under this program, specimens are collected from all suspected case-patients with illness meeting the standardized case definition (Appendix), which is disseminated to all health professionals in CAR through regular training sessions and posters displayed in health facilities. Specimens are sent for biologic confirmation by PCR to the national reference laboratory at Institut Pasteur de Bangui (IPB). Whenever possible, contact tracing is conducted after identification of confirmed cases.

Since 2016, each specimen received at IPB is tested for MPXV by real-time PCR. After specimen processing, 200 µL of each sample are extracted by using the QIAamp Viral DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, https://www.qiagen.com) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The reactions are performed in 25 µL volume containing 12.5 µL of TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, https://www.thermofisher.com), 4.5 µL of nuclease-free water (Thermo Fisher), 1 µL of each 10 µmol/L primer developed by TaqMan technology (Thermo Fisher), using the generic primer (G2RG) and clade I–specific (C3L) primers and 5 µL of extracted DNA (6). On the basis of these same concentrations, varicella zoster virus (VZV) primers (VZV open reading frame 63) are also used (7).

The Study

We conducted a retrospective descriptive study. By using results from all specimens collected from patients with suspected mpox under the national mpox surveillance program during 2016–2022, we aimed to describe the mpox landscape in CAR and evaluate the agreement of mpox test results (including cycle threshold [Ct] values) generated using the G2RG and C3L primers and different specimen types (blood, active lesion, or scab).

Figure 1

Laboratory test results for persons with suspected mpox cases, by year, Central African Republic, 2016–2022. Of 302 suspected cases during the study period, 105 (35%) had positive results for monkeypox virus on >1 specimen.

Figure 1. Laboratory test results for persons with suspected mpox cases, by year, Central African Republic, 2016–2022. Of 302 suspected cases during the study period, 105 (35%) had positive results for monkeypox...

During 2016–2022, a total of 494 specimens (278 blood, 99 active lesion, 95 scab, and 22 oropharyngeal) from 302 patients were received and tested for suspected mpox at IPB. Of the total 302 suspected case-patients, 105 (35%) were positive for MPXV on >1 specimen (varying 19%–64% annually) (Figure 1). Of the 105 MPXV-positive patients, 3 (3%) were also positive for VZV. Of the 197 MPVX-negative patients, 82 (42%) were positive for VZV and 108 (55%) were negative for both MPXV and VZV. The remaining 7 patients were not tested for VZV.

The highest percentage of MPXV-positive specimens derived from the Lobaye and Mbomou prefectures, which together contributed 58% of mpox cases overall. MPXV detection rates varied by prefecture: Sangha Mbaere, 24/40 specimens (60%); Lobaye, 35/106 specimens (33%); Mbomou, 25/74 specimens (34%); and Bangui 2/41 specimens (5%) (Appendix Table 1).

Significantly more female patients were among MPXV-positive than VZV-positive case-patients (p = 0.03) but not among case-patients who were negative for both viruses. The median age across all suspected case-patients was 14 years; we observed no statistically significant difference between the median ages of confirmed case-patients with mpox (17 years) and VZV (20 years) infections. The median age of case-patients who tested negative on both tests was significantly lower (9 years) (Appendix Table 1).

Blood specimens were positive for MPXV on G2RG in 77/278 (28%) of cases, active lesions in 45/102 (44%), scabs in 36/98 (37%), and oropharyngeal specimens in 3/22 (14%) (Table 1). Of specimens returning a positive result on G2RG, the median Ct was 32.11 (interquartile range [IQR] 29.12–35.45) for blood specimens, 18.92 (IQR 17.42–23.43) for active lesions, 18.07 (16.19–19.82) for scabs, and 30.15 (28.04–32.56) for oropharyngeal specimens (Table 2). Similar values were returned by C3L. For paired specimens (Appendix Table 2), we observed either substantial (κ 0.61–0.80) or almost perfect (κ 0.81–1.00) agreement of a positive or negative result on pairwise comparisons of tests conducted on different specimens types on either G2RG or C3L.

Figure 2

Distribution of Ct values obtained using G2RG and C3L primers of monkeypox virus–positive active lesion, blood, and scab specimens in study assessing laboratory diagnosis of mpox, Central African Republic, 2016–2022. C3L, clade I–specific primer; Ct, cycle threshold; G2RG, generic primer.

Figure 2. Distribution of Ct values obtained using G2RG and C3L primers of monkeypox virus–positive active lesion, blood, and scab specimens in study assessing laboratory diagnosis of mpox, Central African Republic, 2016–2022....

The Ct values of G2RG and C3L on blood were significantly higher than in active lesion and scabs, whereas we observed no difference between active lesion and scab specimens. We observed no statistically significant difference between the Ct values generated on G2RG and C3L on the same specimens. (Figure 2)

Conclusions

Approximately one third of suspected mpox cases in CAR are confirmed MPXV infections; an additional 2/5 are VZV infections, leaving ≈3/5 cases of papulovesicular cutaneous eruptions undiagnosed. Most mpox and VZV infections were diagnosed in teenagers and young adults, with an even younger population remaining undiagnosed.

Although cases of mpox are generally detected across the heavily forested, southern parts of CAR, mpox detection rates vary across prefectures. Some prefectures, such as Sangha Mbaere, have a high detection rate of MPXV (60%) over VZV (5%), whereas in others, such as Bangui, detection is much lower (MPXV 5%, VZV 46%). The varying detection rates between prefectures could be linked to local lifestyles and practices, as well as social instability. In the southwest region, local communities primarily subsist through hunting and gathering, spending long periods in mpox-endemic forest, which may increase the risk for exposure to the virus; however, in the southeast, mpox-endemic bushlands are used for farming and as a place of passage or temporary habitation for communities that have been displaced by social instability.

Our study also detected significantly more female patients among mpox-positive than VZV-positive cases, which may be explained by increased risk for infection through multiple routes of exposure to potentially infected sources. For example, women are primarily responsible for skinning and cooking wild game hunted in the forest and are the primary caretakers for family members who fall ill.

Our results demonstrate very high agreement in PCR results between primers. The results also highlight the need to prioritize active lesion and scab specimens over blood specimens, given that their relatively higher viral loads for MPXV and VZV enable better detection.

CAR faces special geographic, social, and healthcare challenges, leading to substantial delays between symptoms onset, diagnosis, and care. The reported case-fatality ratio for clade I mpox cases varies widely and is often cited as 11% (8) but has also been as low as 1.4% in Democratic Republic of Congo (P.R. Pittman et al., unpub. data, https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.26.22273379) and 6.7% in CAR (9). To improve patient outcomes in CAR, diagnostic capacity needs to be strengthened through greater availability of point-of-care testing and through support by more active epidemiologic and genomic surveillance that can be implemented with a wider range of partners.

Ms. Garba-Ouangole is an assistant technical supervisor at Institut Pasteur de Bangui in the Central African Republic. Her primary research interests include genomic surveillance and surveillance of emerging and reemerging infectious diseases and zoonoses.

Top

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office and Wellcome (grant no. 215091/Z/18/Z), the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (grant no. OPP1209135), and the African Coalition for Epidemic Research, Response and Training (ALERRT). ALERRT is part of the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership 2 program supported by the European Union (grant no. RIA2016E-1612). ALERRT is also supported by the United Kingdom’s National Institute for Health Research.

Top

References

  1. Mitjà  O, Ogoina  D, Titanji  BK, Galvan  C, Muyembe  JJ, Marks  M, et al. Monkeypox. Lancet. 2023;401:6074. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gessain  A, Nakoune  E, Yazdanpanah  Y. Monkeypox. N Engl J Med. 2022;387:178393. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Mansour  R, Houston  A, Majeed  A, Boum  Y II, Nakouné  E, Razai  MS. Human monkeypox: diagnosis and management. BMJ. 2023;380:e073352. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Berthet  N, Descorps-Declère  S, Besombes  C, Curaudeau  M, Nkili Meyong  AA, Selekon  B, et al. Genomic history of human monkey pox infections in the Central African Republic between 2001 and 2018. Sci Rep. 2021;11:13085. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Petersen  E, Kantele  A, Koopmans  M, Asogun  D, Yinka-Ogunleye  A, Ihekweazu  C, et al. Human monkeypox: epidemiologic and clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and prevention. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2019;33:102743. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Li  Y, Zhao  H, Wilkins  K, Hughes  C, Damon  IK. Real-time PCR assays for the specific detection of monkeypox virus West African and Congo Basin strain DNA. J Virol Methods. 2010;169:2237. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohrs  RJ, Randall  J, Smith  J, Gilden  DH, Dabrowski  C, van Der Keyl  H, et al. Analysis of individual human trigeminal ganglia for latent herpes simplex virus type 1 and varicella-zoster virus nucleic acids using real-time PCR. J Virol. 2000;74:1146471. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bunge  EM, Hoet  B, Chen  L, Lienert  F, Weidenthaler  H, Baer  LR, et al. The changing epidemiology of human monkeypox-A potential threat? A systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16:e0010141. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Besombes  C, Mbrenga  F, Schaeffer  L, Malaka  C, Gonofio  E, Landier  J, et al. National monkeypox surveillance, Central African Republic, 2001–2021. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022;28:243545. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2909.230514

Original Publication Date: July 12, 2023

1These first authors contributed equally to this article.

2These senior authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 29, Number 9—September 2023

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Josephine Bourner, ISARIC Global Support Centre, International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium, New Richards Building, University of Oxford Old Road Campus, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LG, UK

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: July 05, 2023
Page updated: August 20, 2023
Page reviewed: August 20, 2023
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external