Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 30, Number 2—February 2024
Etymologia

Etymologia: Ring Vaccination

Figures
Article Metrics
Author affiliation: Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Punjab, India

Cite This Article

Ring Vaccination [rɪŋ-væk-sɪ′-neɪ-ʃn]

Ring vaccination (expanding ring, surveillance and containment) is a public health measure designed to prevent spread of disease from infected persons to others. This approach targets persons who have had close contact with confirmed or suspected cases and are at a higher risk of infection by vaccinating them first (Figure).

This strategy has shown remarkable success in combating smallpox caused by respiratory droplet/direct contact–based transmission and shortened incubation for the vaccine. The concept of protecting persons closely exposed to smallpox cases might have its origins in the late 18th century, when the London Small-Pox and Inoculation Hospital was established in 1746. Haygarth (1793) and Carl (1799) suggested systematic variolation of the population and isolation of smallpox cases. In 1877, the Leicester Method, which involved prompt notification, isolation, and quarantine of smallpox cases, was introduced in Leicester (a town in East Midlands, England), and was advocated by local anticompulsory vaccinationists. In 1896, the Royal Commission on Vaccination recommended infant vaccination to control smallpox, although C. Killick Millard, Medical Officer of the Health, appealed for reconsideration. The Leicester method was later supplemented with vaccination or revaccination of contacts in the early 20th century.

After World War II in 1946, despite limited vaccine supplies, Dixon eliminated a smallpox outbreak in the Tripolitania (a former province of Libya) using a method termed expanding ring vaccination. In 1967, Foege and colleagues introduced this concept as surveillance and containment in the smallpox eradication campaign in Nigeria. The strategy proved successful for smallpox because of the disease’s relatively slow spread, mostly through face-to-face contact. The term ring vaccination is now universally used for this process.

Top

References

  1. Dixon  CW. Smallpox in Tripolitania, 1946; an epidemiological and clinical study of 500 cases, including trials of penicillin treatment. J Hyg (Lond). 1948;46:35177. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Fenner  F, Henderson  DA, Arita  I, Jezek  Z, Ladnyi  ID. Chapter VI: Early efforts at control: variolation, vaccination and isolation and quarantine. In: Fenner F, Henderson DA, Arita I, Jezek Z, Ladnyi ID, editors. Smallpox and its eradication. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1988. p. 245–75.
  3. Foege  WH, Millar  JD, Henderson  DA. Smallpox eradication in West and Central Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 1975;52:20922.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Fraser  SM. Leicester and smallpox: the Leicester method. Med Hist. 1980;24:31532. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Millard  CK. Chapter XII: Conclusions. In: Millard CK, editor. The vaccination question in the light of modern experience: an appeal for reconsideration. London: H.K. Lewis and Company; 1914. p. 185–92.

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid3002.221909

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 30, Number 2—February 2024

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Balbir B. Singh, Centre for One Health, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab 141004, India

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: January 09, 2024
Page updated: January 24, 2024
Page reviewed: January 24, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external