Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 13, Number 2—February 2007
Dispatch

Yersinia pestis Orientalis in Remains of Ancient Plague Patients

Figures
Article Metrics
108
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: *Université de la Méditerranée, Marseille, France; †Ministère de la Culture, Paris, France; ‡Service archéologique, Martigues, France;

Cite This Article

Abstract

Yersinia pestis DNA was recently detected in human remains from 2 ancient plague pandemics in France and Germany. We have now sequenced Y. pestis glpD gene in such remains, showing a 93-bp deletion specific for biotype Orientalis. These data show that only Orientalis type caused the 3 plague pandemics.

Three historical pandemics have been attributed to plague. The causative agent, Yersinia pestis, was discovered at the beginning of the ongoing third pandemic. The etiology of the 5th-7th–century first pandemic and the 14th-18th–century second pandemic, however, remained putative until recently (1). Indeed, results of 16S rRNA gene-based detection using teeth collected from 64 persons’ remains in 7 northern Europe sites remained negative (2). When using different molecular targets and the dental pulp as a suitable specimen, we detected Y. pestis–specific DNA fragments in European skeletons of persons suspected of having historical plague (35). Our results were independently confirmed on 6th-century Bavarian teeth (6). Y. pestis comprises biotypes Antiqua, Medievalis, and Orientalis, recognized on the basis of the conversion of nitrate to nitrite and fermentation of glycerol. A fourth biotype, Microtus, describes Medievalis isolates lacking arabinose fermentation. In 1951, Devignat proposed that each of the first 3 biotypes determined each plague pandemic (7). This hypothesis was challenged by our multispacer-typing detection of an Orientalis-like biotype in 5th- to 14th-century dental pulp specimens (5). A 93-bp deletion from the Y. pestis glpD gene encoding the glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase determines lack of glycerol fermentation of the Orientalis biotype (8,9). Isolates of the other biotypes lack this deletion (8). Here, we establish role of Orientalis biotype in the 3 pandemics by sequencing the glpD gene from additional ancient dental pulp specimens.

The Study

Figure

Thumbnail of Skeletons from a mass grave in Martigues, 1720–1721, yielded molecular evidence for the Yersinia pestis Orientalis biotype. Photograph: S. Tzortzis

Figure. Skeletons from a mass grave in Martigues, 1720–1721, yielded molecular evidence for the Yersinia pestis Orientalis biotype. Photograph: S. Tzortzis

We had historical evidence that 3 mass graves excavated in France were used to bury bubonic plague victims. In Vienne, 12 skeletons, including 5 children, buried within the ruins of a Roman temple have been dated from the 7th–9th centuries both by a 5th-century coin and 14C dating. In Martigues, 205 skeletons buried in 5 trenches were dated from 1720 to 1721 on the basis of coins and detailed parish bills that listed the victims (Figure). In Marseille, 216 skeletons buried in a huge pit dated from a May 1722 epidemic relapse. We previously confirmed the diagnosis of plague at this site (3). Eighteen teeth from 5 skeletons in Vienne, 13 teeth from 5 skeletons in Martigues, and 5 teeth from 3 skeletons in Marseille were processed for the search for Y. pestis DNA in the dental pulp. The teeth were processed according to published criteria for authenticating molecular data in paleomicrobiology (10): 1) there should be no positive control; 2) negative controls, as similar as possible to the ancient specimens, should test negative; 3) a new primer sequence targeting a genome region not previously amplified in the laboratory should be used (suicide PCR); 4) any amplicon should be sequenced; 5) a second amplified and sequenced target should confirm any positive result; and 6) an original sequence that differs from modern homologs should be obtained to exclude contamination.

Accordingly, DNA samples were submitted for suicide-nested PCR conducted by using 1 negative control (18th-century teeth from skeletons of persons without anthropologic and macroscopic evidence of infection) for every 3 specimens. Two microliters (1 μL for nested PCR) DNA were amplified in a 50-μL mixture containing 10 pmol of each primer, 200 μmol/L each deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate (Invitrogen, Cergy-Pontoise, France), 1.5 U Taq polymerase (Invitrogen), and 2.5 μL of a 50-mmol/L solution of MgCl2 in 1× Taq buffer. Nested PCR aimed to encompass the entire glpD gene incorporated primers: glpD-F1: 5′-GGC TAG CCG CCT CAA CAA AAA CAT-3′ (positions 170080–170103, reference: Y. pestis strain CO92 genome sequence AJ414159.1)/glpD-R2: 5′-GGT GCC AGT TTC AGT AAC AC-3′ (positions 170402–170383) for initial PCR and glpD-F3: 5′-CGC TGT TTC GAA CAT TCA GA-3′ (positions 170230–170249) /glpD-R3: 5′-GGC CAA GGC TTC ACT TAC CA-3′ (positions 170373–170354) for nested PCR. PCRs were performed in a T3 thermocycler (Biolabo, Archamps, France) under the following conditions: an initial 2 min of denaturation at 95°C was followed by 43 cycles (38 cycles for nested PCR) of denaturation for 30 s at 94°C, annealing for 30 s at 58°C, and extension for 90 s at 68°C. The amplification was completed by holding the reaction mixture for 7 min at 68°C. PCR products purified by using a MultiScreen PCR plate (Millipore Corp., Bedford, MA, USA) were sequenced with a DNA sequencing kit (Big Dye Terminator Cycle Sequencing V2.0; PE Biosystem, Courtaboeuf, France) and subjected to electrophoresis with the 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The sequences were compared in the GenBank database (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/GenBank) using the multisequence alignment Clustal within the BISANCE environment.

No amplification was observed in 11 negative controls, but 5 of 36 teeth yielded an amplicon of 191-bp length in 2 of 4 persons’ remains from Vienne, 2 of 5 from Martigues, and 1 of 3 from Marseille. Amplicons exhibited 100% sequence similarity with that of the Y. pestis Orientalis glpD gene (GenBank accession nos. AY312359 for tooth 35–0235, Vienne; DQ073797 for tooth SQ401521 and DQ073798 for tooth SQ408113, Martigues; and AY312360 for tooth 25–0225, Marseille) and were characterized by a 93-bp deletion when compared with the glpD gene sequence of the Y. pestis Medievalis biotype (GenBank accession no. AE 013994).

Conclusions

In this study, contamination of the ancient specimens is unlikely because of the extensive precautions we took, including use of the suicide PCR protocol excluding positive controls (4). Accordingly, glpD gene had never been investigated in our laboratory before this study, and negative controls remained negative. The specificity of the amplicons was ensured by complete similarity of experimental sequences with that of the Y. pestis Orientalis glpD gene (8). One site (Marseille, 1722) was previously positive for Y. pestis after sequencing of 2 different targets (chromosome-borne rpob and plasmid-borne pla genes) in other specimens collected in other persons’ remains (3).

These results therefore confirm the detection of Y. pestis–specific DNA in plague patients’ remains from the first and second epidemics (36). We observed a 93-bp in-frame deletion within the glpD gene sequences obtained from ancient dental pulp specimens. This deletion has been found only in Orientalis biotype isolates in 2 independent studies comprising a total of 77 and 260 Y. pestis isolates, respectively, of the 4 biotypes (8,9).

After previous demonstration of Y. pestis Orientalis-type multiple spacer type sequences in Justinian and medieval specimens (5), we now have cumulative evidence using 2 different molecular approaches that Y. pestis closely related to the Orientalis biotype was responsible for the 3 historical plague pandemics.

Mr Drancourt is professor of medical microbiology in Unité des Rickettsies, Marseille Médical School, Marseille, France. His research interests are paleomicrobiology of plague and bartonelloses.

Top

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by grants from Unité des Rickettsies.

Top

References

  1. Perry RD, Fetherston JD. Yersinia pestis— etiologic agent of plague.Clin Microbiol Rev. 1997;10:3566.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gilbert MTP, Cuccui J, White W, Lynnerup N, Titball RW, Cooper A, Absence of Yersinia pestis-specific DNA in human teeth from five European excavations of putative plague victims.Microbiology. 2004;150:34154. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Drancourt M, Aboudharam G, Signoli M, Dutour O, Raoult D. Detection of 400-year-old Yersinia pestis DNA in human dental pulp: an approach to the diagnosis of ancient septicemia.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:1263740. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Raoult D, Aboudharam G, Crubezy E, Larrouy G, Ludes B, Drancourt M. Molecular identification by “suicide PCR” of Yersinia pestis as the agent of medieval black death.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:128003. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Drancourt M, Roux V, Dang LV, Tran-Hung L, Castex D, Chenal-Francisque V, Genotyping, Orientalis-like Yersinia pestis, and plague pandemics.Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:158592.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wiechmann I, Grupe G. Detection of Yersinia pestis DNA in two early medieval skeletal finds from Aschheim (Upper Bavaria, 6th century A.D.).Am J Phys Anthropol. 2005;126:4855. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Devignat R. Varieties of Pasteurella pestis; new hypothesis.Bull World Health Organ. 1951;4:24763.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Motin VL, Georgescu AM, Elliott JM, Hu P, Worsham PL, Ott LL, Genetic variability of Yersinia pestis isolates as predicted by PCR-based IS100 genotyping and analysis of structural genes encoding glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (glpD).J Bacteriol. 2002;184:101927. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhou D, Tong Z, Song Y, Han Y, Pei D, Pang X, Genetics of metabolic variations between Yersinia pestis biovars and the proposal of a new biovar, microtus.J Bacteriol. 2004;186:514752. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Drancourt M, Raoult D. Paleomicrobiology: current issues and perspectives.Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005;3:235. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1302.060197

Table of Contents – Volume 13, Number 2—February 2007

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Didier Raoult, Unité des Rickettsies CNRS UMR 6020, Faculté de Médecine, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille CEDEX 05, France;

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: June 29, 2010
Page updated: June 29, 2010
Page reviewed: June 29, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external