Volume 14, Number 7—July 2008
Dispatch
Proficiency of Nucleic Acid Tests for Avian Influenza Viruses, Australasia
Table 2
Panel no.† | Date | % Correct results, Indonesian strain‡ | % Correct results, Vietnamese strain‡ | % Testing for influenza A matrix | Most common extraction method (% participants) | Most common amplification method (% participants) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2006 Oct 7 | 87.5 | 80 | 46 | QIAGEN QIAamp viral RNA minikit (50) | QIAGEN Artus Influenza/H5 LC RT-PCR kit (20) |
2 | 2006 Nov 9 | 84 | 84 | 73 | QIAGEN QIAamp viral RNA minikit (50) | Invitrogen Superscript III qRT-PCR (31) |
3 | 2006 Jun 11 | 82 | 88 | 75 | QIAGEN QIAamp viral RNA minikit (50) | Invitrogen Superscript III qRT-PCR (40) |
*RT-PCR, reverse transcription–PCR.
†Panels 2 and 3 had 2 very low dilutions of subtype H5N1 that were beyond the limit of detection for most laboratories. Percentage of correct results reported for the Indonesian and Vietnamese strains, with these results included, is 59 and 59 for panel 2 and 56 and 66 for panel 3, respectively.
‡Results reported for influenza H5/(H5N1) testing.
Page created: July 12, 2010
Page updated: July 12, 2010
Page reviewed: July 12, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.