Volume 17, Number 12—December 2011
Research
West Nile Virus Infection of Birds, Mexico
Table 2
Species | No. | WNV strain | Oral shedding |
Cloacal shedding |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peak titer, log PFU/swab† | When detected, dpi | Proportion positive | Peak titer, log PFU/swab† | When detected, dpi | Proportion positive | ||||
House sparrow | 6 | Tecate | 5.0 | 2–7 | 1.00 | 1.4 | 2–3 | 0.83 | |
6 | Tabasco | 7.2 | 2–6 | 0.67 | 4.9 | 4 | NR | ||
Great-tailed grackle | 4 | Tecate | 3.7 | 2–7 | 0.75 | 2.4 | 3 | 0.75 | |
4 | Tabasco | 6.2 | 5–6 | 0.75 | 4.6 | 3–7 | NR |
*dpi, days postinoculation; NR, not reported because of insufficient sample collection.
†Peak titers and end point of detection might be underestimated because of intermittent sample collection.
1Current affiliation: El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Campeche, Mexico.
Page created: November 30, 2011
Page updated: November 30, 2011
Page reviewed: November 30, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.