Volume 17, Number 12—December 2011
CME ACTIVITY - Perspective
Risk for Rabies Importation from North Africa
Philippe Gautret
, Florence Ribadeau-Dumas, Philippe Parola, Philippe Brouqui, and Hervé Bourhy
, Florence Ribadeau-Dumas, Philippe Parola, Philippe Brouqui, and Hervé Bourhy
Table 4
Patients receiving rabies PEP among patients consulting an antirabies medical center, France, 1996–2009*
| Location of possible exposure | % Patients age <15 y among those who received rabies PEP† | % Patients age <6 y among those who received rabies PEP† | % Patients who received rabies PEP among those age <15 y† | % Patients who received rabies PEP among those age <6 y† | Total no. patients‡ |
Total no. patients who received rabies PEP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <15 y of age | <6 y of age | ||||||
| North Africa | 29.4 | 12.3 | 94.8 | 95.1 | 735 | 306 | 2,374 |
| All other | 24.2 | 8.8 | 44.1 | 37.9 | 37,895 | 16,093 | 69,145 |
*Original data from the French National Reference Centre for Rabies. PEP, postexposure prophylaxis.
†p<10–6.
‡Regardless of rabies PEP status.
Reference 25 "Peigue-Lafeuille, Bourhy, Abiteboul, Astoul, Cliquet, Gouda, et al., 2004" is not cited in the text. Please add an in-text citation or delete the reference.
Page created: November 30, 2011
Page updated: November 30, 2011
Page reviewed: November 30, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.