Volume 18, Number 1—January 2012
Dispatch
Unexpected Result of Hendra Virus Outbreaks for Veterinarians, Queensland, Australia
Table 2
Study participants | No. (%) | Age, y (range)* | Years since graduation* (range)† | % Time spent doing equine work* (range)‡ | Distribution by job title, no. (%) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Principal veterinarian | Partner/associate or employee veterinarian | Veterinary nurse | Practice manager | |||||
Female | 8 (38.1) | 35.8 (31–48) | 13.1 (4–27) | 30.4 (2–95)§ | 1 (4.8) | 5 (23.8) | 2 (9.5) | 0 |
Male | 13 (61.9) | 48.5 (28–63) | 22.9 (4–40) | 52.1 (2–100)¶ | 9 (42.8) | 3 (14.3) | 0 | 1 (4.8) |
Total | 21 (100.0) | 42.2 (28–63) | 19.0 (4–40) | 47.3 (2–100) | 10 (47.6) | 8 (38.1) | 2 (9.5) | 1 (4.8) |
*Average.
†The practice manager interviewed was not a veterinarian and did not wish to supply this information.
‡Self-reported.
§One female participant did not provide this information.
¶The 1 participant who was a practice manager but not a veterinarian had not spent any time with animals and therefore was not included.
Page created: December 19, 2011
Page updated: December 19, 2011
Page reviewed: December 19, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.