Volume 21, Number 11—November 2015
Research
Contact Tracing Activities during the Ebola Virus Disease Epidemic in Kindia and Faranah, Guinea, 2014
Table 1
Characteristic | Prefecture |
|
---|---|---|
Kindia, n = 90 | Faranah, n = 62 | |
Case classification, no. (%) patients | ||
Confirmed | 63 (70.0) | 39 (62.9) |
Probable |
27 (30.0) |
23 (37.1) |
Registered as contacts before case identification, no. (%) patients |
28 (31.1) |
17 (27.4) |
Age, y | ||
Median | 35.0 | 30.0 |
IQR | 20.0–50.0 | 14.0–47.0 |
<18 y, no. (%) |
21 (23.3) |
19 (30.6) |
Female sex, no. (%) patients |
52 (57.8) |
33 (53.2) |
Villages, no. |
23 |
11 |
Subprefectures, no. |
7 |
4 |
Median time to isolation, d (IQR) |
5 (3–7) |
3 (1–6) |
Final outcome, no. (%) patients | ||
Deceased |
71 (78.9) |
52 (83.9) |
Place of death, no. (%) patients | ||
Ebola treatment unit | 36 (50.7) | 28 (53.8) |
Community |
35 (49.1) |
24 (46.1) |
Burial type for community deaths, no. (%) patients† | ||
Safe | 5 (14.3) | 20 (90.9) |
Unsafe |
30 (85.7) |
2 (9.1) |
Case-patients for whom contacts are registered, no. (%) | 35 (38.9) | 20 (32.2) |
*Data in this table originate from the prefecture case database. The variables “registered as contacts before case identification” and “No. (%)” were created in the prefecture case database by cross-referencing with the contact database. IQR, interquartile range.
†Burial data from Faranah missing for 2 case-patients.
Page created: October 16, 2015
Page updated: October 16, 2015
Page reviewed: October 16, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.