Volume 21, Number 6—June 2015
Research
Dose-Response Relationship between Antimicrobial Drugs and Livestock-Associated MRSA in Pig Farming1
Table 2
Characteristic | Total study population | Farmers, employees | Partners | Children |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age, y (SD) | 33.0 (17.8) | 44.0 (13.6) | 45.2 (8.9) | 14.4 (5.6) |
Mean time worked, h (SD) | 21.8 (25.2) | 46.0 (19.9) | 10.1 (14.0) | 2.2 (6.6) |
Total no. |
158 |
66 |
32 |
60 |
Sex | ||||
M | 91 | 58 | 0 | 33 |
F |
67 |
8 |
32 |
27 |
Open farm | 91 | 34 | 17 | 40 |
Farrowing† | 26 | 11 | 5 | 10 |
Farrow-to finish |
65 |
23 |
12 |
30 |
Closed farm | 67 | 32 | 15 | 20 |
Farrowing† | 14 | 8 | 3 | 3 |
Farrow-to finish | 53 | 24 | 12 | 17 |
*Farms were defined as open when they received external supplies of gilts ≥1 time per year from at least 1 supplier and as closed when they received no external supply of gilts.
†No fattening pigs present.
1Preliminary results from this study were presented at the 3rd American Society for Microbiology–European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ASM-ESCMID) Conference on Methicillin-resistant Staphylococci in Animals: Veterinary Public Health Implications, 2013 November 4–7, Copenhagen, Denmark (oral presentation, speaker abstract S7:3); and at the Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine annual meeting, 2014 March 26–28, Dublin, Ireland (poster presentation).
Page created: May 15, 2015
Page updated: May 15, 2015
Page reviewed: May 15, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.