Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
CDC’s website is being modified to comply with President Trump’s Executive Orders.
Volume 28, Number 10—October 2022
CME ACTIVITY - Synopsis

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Foodborne Tick-Borne Encephalitis, Europe, 1980–2021

Meital ElbazComments to Author , Avi Gadoth, Daniel Shepshelovich, David Shasha, Nir Rudoler, and Yael Paran
Author affiliations: Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel (M. Elbaz, A. Godath, D. Shepshelovich, D. Sasha, Y. Paran); Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv (A. Godath, D. Shepshelovich, D. Sasha, Y. Paran); Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel (N. Rudoler); Ministry of Health, Tel Aviv (N. Rudoler)

Main Article

Figure 2

Analysis of clinical attack rate of foodborne tick-borne encephalitis, Europe, 1980–2021. A) Attack rate calculated for 10 outbreaks in which the number of exposed persons was reported. B) Attack rate calculated only for 7 outbreaks with >10 reported persons affected. I2, level of heterogeneity.

Figure 2. Analysis of clinical attack rate of foodborne tick-borne encephalitis, Europe, 1980–2021. A) Attack rate calculated for 10 outbreaks in which the number of exposed persons was reported. B) Attack rate calculated only for 7 outbreaks with >10 reported persons affected. I2, level of heterogeneity.

Main Article

Page created: August 05, 2022
Page updated: September 15, 2022
Page reviewed: September 15, 2022
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external