Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 29, Number 11—November 2023
Research Letter

Case Report and Literature Review of Prosthetic Cardiovascular Mucormycosis

Author affiliations: University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France (B. Hoellinger, L. Magnus, Y. Ruch, M. Ohana, Y. Hansmann, V. Letscher-Bru, A. Lejay, N. Chakfé, F. Danion); University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France (L. Magnus); Inserm UMR_S 1109, Strasbourg (F. Danion)

Cite This Article

Abstract

We report a rare case of aorto-bi-iliac prosthetic allograft mucormycosis in a 57-year-old immunocompetent patient in France. Outcome was favorable after surgery and dual antifungal therapy with liposomal amphotericin B and isavuconazole. In a literature review, we identified 12 other cases of prosthetic vascular or heart valve mucormycosis; mortality rate was 38%.

Mucormycosis, caused by fungi of order Mucorales, is a rare, life-threatening fungal infection whose incidence has been rising since the late 1990s (1). The main infection locations are pulmonary, rhino-orbito-cerebral, cutaneous, and disseminated. Although the vascular tropism of Mucorales is well described, few cases of cardiovascular infections have been reported (2). We report a rare case of aorto-bi-iliac prosthetic allograft mucormycosis in a 57-year-old immunocompetent patient in France. We obtained written informed consent from the patient for publication of this report.

Figure

Vascular prosthetic mucormycosis in a 57-year-old immunocompetent patient in France. A, B) Aortic computed-tomography angiogram (A) and 3-dimensional reconstruction (B) show the periprosthetic collection and vascular leak (arrows). C) Intraoperative view shows the graft exposure and false necrotic membranes.

Figure. Vascular prosthetic mucormycosis in a 57-year-old immunocompetent patient in France. A, B) Aortic computed-tomography angiogram (A) and 3-dimensional reconstruction (B) show the periprosthetic collection and vascular leak (arrows). C) Intraoperative...

The patient, who had a history of type B aortic dissection, underwent an open surgical repair of a right common iliac artery aneurysm with aorto-bi-iliac prosthetic graft reconstruction (day 0). We noted a bowel perforation at the end of the surgery and performed resection-anastomosis. Because of a history of allergy to penicillin, we treated the patient with aztreonam, metronidazole, vancomycin, and amikacin. The patient acquired an early postoperative Candida albicans infection diagnosed on periprosthetic collection puncture and treated with caspofungin on day 10. On day 30, he had emergency surgery for proximal anastomosis rupture with hemorrhagic shock (Figure, panels A, B). All the prosthetic material was excised with in situ reconstruction using a silver-coated prosthetic aorto-bi-iliac graft. Three intraoperative samples were positive for Lactobacillus plantarum and Rhizopus microsporus pathogens. Serum samples were positive by Mucorales PCR for Rhizopus, which we confirmed on 5 other samples (3). Histology was not performed. Neither chest computed tomography nor brain magnetic resonance imaging showed another location of infection. We replaced caspofungin with liposomal amphotericin B (5 mg/kg).

We performed surgical revision for recurrence of collection on day 37; the patient had retroperitoneal necrosis with false necrotic membranes, another digestive fistula, and graft exposure (Figure, panel C). We performed tissue debridement, perigraft collection drainage, and irrigation associated with bowel resection-anastomosis and omentoplasty to cover the graft. We administered isavuconazole with liposomal amphotericin B after surgery. Cultures of the peroperative samples found R. microsporus and C. albicans. Histology showed signs of acute inflammation in contact with the prosthetic fibers, but specific staining was not performed. Serum samples tested by Mucorales PCRs 3 times/week were still positive at day 37 and became negative at day 52. We performed surgery again, excising the silver-coated graft and then using a cryopreserved human allograft for in situ aorto-iliac reconstruction, on day 95. Three months later, the patient’s clinical and biologic progress was favorable; amphotericin B was discontinued, and isavuconazole was continued on a long-term basis. After 1 year of follow-up, the infection had not recurred.

We performed a literature review of cases of prosthetic vascular or heart valve mucormycosis and identified 13 cases, including our case (Appendix). Nine of those patients were male and 4 female; median age was 54 years. Two (15%) of the patients had known immunosuppression, 1 from solid organ transplantation and 1 from hematologic malignancy. Two patients had received steroids in the weeks before illness. Seven patients had a vascular infection. Eight had endocarditis; of interest, 4 of those 8 patients had emboli in the lower limbs, which is usually a rare embolic site in endocarditis (4). Nine (69%) of 13 patients had an early postoperative infection (<4 months after surgery). The mucormycosis infection was monomicrobial in 10 (85%) of the 13 cases. Two patients were co-infected with Aspergillus; the patient we report was co-infected with Candida albicans. Ten of the 13 patients received treatment with liposomal or deoxycholate amphotericin B; 2 patients died before they could receive any treatment. Surgery was performed in 11/13 patients, and infected prothesis were explanted in 10 patients. Five (38%) of the 13 patients died.

The main fungal cause of vascular infection and endocarditis is Candida spp. Mucormycosis occurs mainly in immunocompromised patients. However, certain forms can occur in immunocompetent patients, particularly posttraumatic and healthcare-associated forms; prosthetic mucormycosis also seems to fall into this category (5). We suggest 2 hypotheses for the mechanism of mucormycosis in our patient: a healthcare-associated mucormycosis, if we consider that the implanted prosthesis could have been contaminated, or a contamination of the prosthesis by digestive perforation (6). As for the second hypothesis, Mucorales are found on many foods; in our patient’s case, ongoing treatment with caspofungin and broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy could have encouraged colonization (7).

Our study and review of the literature suggest a better prognosis for vascular prosthetic mucormycosis than for pulmonary and disseminated mucormycosis, probably because it occurs in immunocompetent patients and the source can be effectively controlled by surgery. However, we acknowledge that reporting cases with favorable outcomes may have introduced bias. The first-line treatment for mucormycosis is liposomal amphotericin B (5 mg/kg) (8). Surgery is crucial for controlling the infection, particularly in extrapulmonary locations (8). The benefit of amphotericin B/isavuconazole dual therapy has been suggested in a neutropenic mice model and should be explored for difficult-to-treat locations, especially when a prosthesis is involved (9). In conclusion, prosthetic cardiac and vascular mucormycosis are very rare infections that require prompt surgery and antifungal therapy.

Dr. Hoellinger is an infectious diseases physician working at the University Hospital of Strasbourg in France. His primary research interest is fungal infections.

Top

Acknowledgments

F.D. declares personal fees from Gilead and Pfizer. Y.H. declares personal fees from Pfizer.

Author contributions: B.H. reviewed the literature. B.H., L.M., and F.D. conceived the case report and drafted the manuscript. L.M., A.L., and N.C. were involved in the management of the patient. F.D., L.M., B.H., N.C., A.L., V.L., Y.H., and M.O. provided critical revision of the manuscript for important content. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Top

References

  1. Danion  F, Coste  A, Le Hyaric  C, Melenotte  C, Lamoth  F, Calandra  T, et al. What is new in pulmonary mucormycosis? J Fungi (Basel). 2023;9:307. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ben-Ami  R, Luna  M, Lewis  RE, Walsh  TJ, Kontoyiannis  DP. A clinicopathological study of pulmonary mucormycosis in cancer patients: extensive angioinvasion but limited inflammatory response. J Infect. 2009;59:1348. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Millon  L, Larosa  F, Lepiller  Q, Legrand  F, Rocchi  S, Daguindau  E, et al. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction detection of circulating DNA in serum for early diagnosis of mucormycosis in immunocompromised patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:e95101. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Millaire  A, Leroy  O, Gaday  V, de Groote  P, Beuscart  C, Goullard  L, et al. Incidence and prognosis of embolic events and metastatic infections in infective endocarditis. Eur Heart J. 1997;18:67784. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Petrikkos  G, Skiada  A, Lortholary  O, Roilides  E, Walsh  TJ, Kontoyiannis  DP. Epidemiology and clinical manifestations of mucormycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(Suppl 1):S2334. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Rammaert  B, Lanternier  F, Zahar  JR, Dannaoui  E, Bougnoux  ME, Lecuit  M, et al. Healthcare-associated mucormycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(Suppl 1):S4454. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Paterson  RRM, Lima  N. Filamentous fungal human pathogens from food emphasising Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Mucor. Microorganisms. 2017;5:44. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cornely  OA, Alastruey-Izquierdo  A, Arenz  D, Chen  SCA, Dannaoui  E, Hochhegger  B, et al.; Mucormycosis ECMM MSG Global Guideline Writing Group. Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of mucormycosis: an initiative of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology in cooperation with the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:e40521. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Gebremariam  T, Gu  Y, Singh  S, Kitt  TM, Ibrahim  AS. Combination treatment of liposomal amphotericin B and isavuconazole is synergistic in treating experimental mucormycosis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;76:26369. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2911.230837

Original Publication Date: October 03, 2023

Table of Contents – Volume 29, Number 11—November 2023

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

François Danion, CHU de Strasbourg, Department of Infectious Diseases, 1 place de l’Hôpital, 67 000, Strasbourg, France

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: September 28, 2023
Page updated: October 23, 2023
Page reviewed: October 23, 2023
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external