Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 31, Number 4—April 2025
Research Letter

Coxiella burnetii Infections Identified by Molecular Methods, United States, 2006–2023

Caroline K. Maki, Thao T. Truong, Johanna S. Salzer, Nicolette Bestul, Brad T. Cookson, Gilbert J. Kersh, Stephen J. Salipante, Joshua A. Lieberman1, and David W. McCormick1Comments to Author 
Author affiliation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (C.K. Maki, J.S. Salzer, N. Bestul, G.J. Kersh, D.W. McCormick); Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA (C.K. Maki); University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA (T.T. Truong, B.T. Cookson, S.J. Salipante, J.A. Lieberman)

Main Article

Table 1

Characteristics of case-patients with invasive Coxiella burnetii infection identified by molecular methods, United States, 2006–2023*

Characteristic No. (%)
Sex
M 19 (56)
F 9 (27)
NA
6 (18)
State of residence
California 9 (27)
Washington 7 (21)
Ohio 6 (18)
Utah 4 (12)
Texas 2 (6)
Oregon 2 (6)
Montana 1 (3)
Virginia 1 (3)
Kentucky 1 (3)
Nevada
1 (3)
Specimen type, n = 35†
Cardiac 30 (86)
Aortic‡ 18 (78)
Mitral 5 (22)
Pulmonary 1 (50)
Tricuspid 1 (50)
Heart NOS§
5 (17)
Not cardiac 5 (14)
Synovial fluid 1 (2)
Knee joint 1 (2)
Chest cyst fluid 1 (2)
Psoas abscess 1 (2)
Retrocaval abscess 1 (2)

*Median age of patients at sample collection was 62.5 years; age range 23–79 years. NA, not available; NOS, not otherwise specified. †One patient had 2 positive specimens (tricuspid and mitral valve). ‡Six aortic specimens were prosthetic valves. §Two heart NOS specimens were prosthetic valves.

Main Article

1These senior authors contributed equally to this article.

Page created: February 28, 2025
Page updated: March 12, 2025
Page reviewed: March 12, 2025
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external