Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 12, Number 6—June 2006
Research

Severe Community-acquired Pneumonia Due to Staphylococcus aureus, 2003–04 Influenza Season

On This Page
Methods
Results
Discussion
Cite This Article
Figures
Figure
Tables
Table 1
Table 2
Downloads
Article
RIS [TXT - 2 KB]
Article Metrics
Metric Details
329
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Related Articles
Computerized Systems for Pneumonia Surveillance
MDR Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae
COVID-19 and Non-HIV P. jirovecii Pneumonia
More articles on Pneumonia
Author affiliations: *Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; †Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; ‡University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences College of Medicine, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA; §Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA; ¶Michigan Department of Community Health, Lansing, Michigan, USA; #National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; **Oklahoma State Department of Health, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA; ††Washington State Department of Health, Shoreline, Washington, USA

Cite This Article

Abstract

During the 2003–04 influenza season, 17 cases of Staphylococcus aureus community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) were reported from 9 states; 15 (88%) were associated with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). The median age of patients was 21 years; 5 (29%) had underlying diseases, and 4 (24%) had risk factors for MRSA. Twelve (71%) had laboratory evidence of influenza virus infection. All but 1 patient, who died on arrival, were hospitalized. Death occurred in 5 (4 with MRSA). S. aureus isolates were available from 13 (76%) patients (11 MRSA). Toxin genes were detected in all isolates; 11 (85%) had only genes for Panton-Valentine leukocidin. All isolates had community-associated pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns; all MRSA isolates had the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IVa. In communities with a high prevalence of MRSA, empiric therapy of severe CAP during periods of high influenza activity should include consideration for MRSA.

Staphylococcus aureus is an infrequent cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), accounting for ≈3% of cases in which a bacterial cause is identified, but it is a recognized cause of influenza-associated CAP (1–4). Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) commonly causes nosocomial pneumonia, but relatively few cases of MRSA CAP have been reported (5,6).

Recent reports have shown that MRSA is an emerging cause of skin and soft tissue disease among otherwise healthy persons who have little or no contact with healthcare settings (7,8). These community-associated strains of MRSA differ from healthcare-associated strains by having a characteristic methicillin-resistant gene cassette (staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec [SCCmec] type IV) that elicits certain toxins, notably Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), resistance generally limited to the β-lactams and macrolides, and specific molecular typing patterns (8–10).

During the 2003–04 influenza season, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) received reports of severe complications after influenza virus infection, including pneumonia caused by S. aureus and MRSA, among previously healthy children and adults. We report the demographic and clinical features of 17 patients with S. aureus and MRSA CAP associated with influenza or influenzalike illness (ILI) and describe the microbiologic characteristics of the S. aureus isolates.

Methods

Case Definition and Case Finding

A case of S. aureus CAP associated with ILI (S. aureus CAP-ILI) was defined as pneumonia occurring during the 2003–04 influenza season in a person with either laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection, clinician-determined ILI (e.g., fever plus sore throat or cough), or both during the 2003–04 influenza season from whom a specimen (i.e., blood, sputum, or pleural fluid) collected <48 hours after hospitalization yielded S. aureus. Cases were identified by following up on reports of influenza-associated staphylococcal complications on 2 influenza assessment surveys conducted in December 2003 by the Infectious Diseases Society of America Emerging Infections Network, which consists of 859 infectious disease consultants (11). These surveys collected information on the 2003–04 influenza outbreak, including influenza-related complications, such as secondary bacterial infections, among pediatric and adult populations. Reports were also received through state and local health departments. Detailed clinical information on 4 cases was presented previously (12). We contacted clinicians and collected information by using a standardized data collection form on patient demographics, past medical history, signs and symptoms at the time the patient sought medical care, hospitalization, laboratory data including influenza testing, and risk factors for acquisition of MRSA (i.e., hospitalization, dialysis, surgery, or residence in a long-term care facility in the previous year; ever having an MRSA infection; and presence of percutaneous device or catheter at time of positive S. aureus culture). In addition, data on empiric (i.e., before S. aureus culture results were known) and targeted (i.e., after S. aureus culture results known) antimicrobial therapy and clinical outcomes were collected. Discordant empiric or targeted therapy was defined as a drug regimen that did not include an antimicrobial agent to which S. aureus was susceptible.

Laboratory Procedures

S. aureus isolates from patients were collected and sent to CDC for characterization. All available isolates were tested for susceptibility to chloramphenicol, clindamycin, erythromycin, gentamicin, levofloxacin, linezolid, oxacillin, penicillin, rifampin, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin by using broth microdilution, as recommended by the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (13). Inducible clindamycin resistance was determined for isolates with the erythromycin-resistant/clindamycin-susceptible phenotype by using the double-disk diffusion test (D-zone test) (13). All isolates were tested for genes encoding selected toxins (staphylococcal enterotoxin [SE] A–E, H; PVL; and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1) by multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers prepared at CDC. All MRSA isolates underwent typing of their SCCmec gene cassette with PCR (14). Genotyping of all isolates was performed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) with SmaI-digested DNA, and gels were analyzed as previously described (9).

Results

Case Characteristics

From November 10, 2003, to January 4, 2004, 17 cases of S. aureus CAP-ILI were reported from 9 states (Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, and Washington); 15 (88%) were due to MRSA. The median age of the 17 case-patients was 21 years; 5 (29%) patients had underlying diseases, and 4 (24%) had risk factors for MRSA (Table 1) Although 5 (29%) patients were in the primary target groups (i.e., underlying illness [n = 2], age 50–64 years [n = 3]) recommended for annual influenza vaccination under current guidelines, only 1 (20%) had documented influenza vaccination during 2003–04. All case-patients had clinician-determined ILI. Twelve (71%) of the 17 patients had laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection; 10 of these were confirmed by rapid antigen testing. S. aureus was recovered from multiple sources including sputum (14 [82%]), blood (8 [47%]), and pleural fluid (4 [24%].

Respiratory symptoms began a median of 4 days (range 1–17 days) before S. aureus specimen collection. All patients had >1of the following at the time they sought medical care: cough, myalgias, sore throat, headache, or shortness of breath. Most had fever, hypotension, and normal or elevated leukocyte counts. Four (25%) had leukopenia, and 6 (38%) had thrombocytopenia. Radiologic information was available for review for 16 patients, and all had documentation of an infiltrate. Information on empiric antimicrobial therapy was available for 15 patients; most received a third-generation cephalosporin (9 [60%]), respiratory fluoroquinolone (i.e., levofloxacin, gatifloxacin, or moxifloxacin) (7 [47%]), or vancomycin (10 [67%]); most patients (13 [87%]) received multiple antimicrobial agents. Discordant empiric antimicrobial therapy was documented in 3 (20%) patients, all of whom received a third-generation cephalosporin with or without a macrolide. Information on targeted antimicrobial therapy was provided for 13 patients (2 died before targeted treatment could be initiated) and consisted of vancomycin (10 [77%]), linezolid (2 [15%]), clindamycin (5 [38%]), and fluoroquinolones (4 [31%]); many patients (9 [69%]) received multiple antimicrobial drugs.

One patient was pronounced dead on arrival at the emergency department. Most patients were admitted to the intensive care unit and required intubation, and placement of chest tubes (Table 2). The median number of hospital days for patients was 13 (range 1–108 days). Five patients (4 with MRSA) died; their median age was 28 years (range 2 months–52 years), and only 1 had underlying illness (diabetes). Most died within 1 week of symptom onset.

Laboratory Findings

Figure

Thumbnail of Dendrogram of Staphylococcus aureus isolates determined by using SmaI–digested DNA recovered from patients with community-acquired pneumonia associated with influenzalike illness, influenza season, 2003–04. NA, not applicable (methicillin-susceptible); SE, staphylococcal enterotoxin A, B, C, H; REF, reference strain; PVL, Panton-Valentine leukocidin; TSST, toxin shock syndrome toxin; CHL, chloramphenicol; CLI, clindamycin; ERY, erythromycin; GM, gentamicin; LEV, levofloxacin; OX, ox

Figure. Dendrogram of Staphylococcus aureus isolates determined by using SmaI–digested DNA recovered from patients with community-acquired pneumonia associated with influenzalike illness, influenza season, 2003–04. NA, not applicable (methicillin-susceptible); SE, staphylococcal enterotoxin A,...

S. aureus isolates were available from 13 (76%) patients (11 MRSA, 2 methicillin-susceptible S. aureus) from 9 states. Toxin genes were detected in all isolates; 11 (85%) had only the PVL genes, whereas 2 (15%) had genes for SEA, SEB, and SEH (Figure) All MRSA isolates had the SCCmec type IVa resistance gene cassette. Antimicrobial drug–susceptibility testing results for the MRSA isolates showed that all were resistant to oxacillin and erythromycin but susceptible to linezolid, rifampin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and vancomycin; 10 (91%) and 6 (55%) isolates, respectively, were susceptible to clindamycin and levofloxacin. The 1 MRSA isolate that was not susceptible to clindamycin demonstrated inducible resistance by the D-zone test. In 4 cases, isolates were not available for testing at CDC. Antimicrobial drug susceptibility test results performed at the treating facility indicated that these 4 isolates were MRSA and nonsusceptible to macrolides (n = 4), clindamycin (n = 1), and levofloxacin (n = 1).

Analysis of PFGE results showed that 11 (85%) were community-associated pulsed-field types USA300, and 2 (15%) were USA400, according to CDC criteria (Figure). Of the 10 MRSA isolates that were classified as pulsed-field type USA300, 8 (80%) from 6 different states had indistinguishable banding patterns and were further classified as USA300 subtype 0114. These MRSA isolates differed from pulsed-field types associated with healthcare-related strains (USA100 and 200) (9).

Discussion

We report the emergence of S. aureus and MRSA as a cause of CAP-ILI resulting in severe illness and death in otherwise healthy persons in the United States during the 2003–04 influenza season. Most infections were caused by MRSA strains that contained PVL genes and were uniformly resistant to macrolides; half were nonsusceptible to fluoroquinolones. However, the isolates were susceptible to other antimicrobial agents, including vancomycin and linezolid. Although some phenotypic differences were noted, most cases of pneumonia appeared to be attributable to a single strain of MRSA found in diverse geographic areas. This strain, USA300 subtype 0114, is a predominant strain responsible for community outbreaks of MRSA skin disease in the United States (8,9,15).

Postinfluenza staphylococcal pneumonia has been reported in healthy adults during influenza pandemics and epidemics for the last century; it has been reported in the literature less frequently during the past 30 years (1–3). The recognition of MRSA as a cause of CAP-ILI has occurred concomitant with reports of MRSA as an increasingly common cause of skin and soft tissue infection in the community. Molecular typing of isolates in our series demonstrates that the CAP-ILI isolates are indistinguishable from MRSA associated with numerous outbreaks of skin and soft tissue infections (8). Given this association, MRSA might become a more common cause of S. aureus CAP following or coincident to influenza infection in regions where the MRSA strain is prevalent as a cause of skin and soft tissue infection. Antecedent S. aureus skin infection or colonization may be associated with postinfluenza S. aureus CAP, as was reported during the 1957 influenza pandemic (16). Although we did not systematically collect information on antecedent skin infections in our study, skin infections occurring among families of case-patients were noted. Given the apparent wide national distribution of MRSA as a cause of skin disease, physicians should be aware that MRSA can cause not only skin and soft tissue infections but also CAP.

Although most of the reported patients had laboratory confirmation of influenza virus as a cause of preceding illness, those diagnoses based solely on clinical symptoms may have been caused by other viral respiratory pathogens. However, growing evidence of mechanisms by which influenza may interact specifically with S. aureus to increase the risk for influenza–S. aureus co-infections suggests that these S. aureus CAP infections were likely associated with influenza (17). These include an influenza-induced increase in S. aureus–specific adhesion throughout the respiratory tract and S. aureus–specific proteases, which may increase influenza viral replication (18–20). This latter mechanism actually points to a synergistic relationship in which S. aureus increases influenza disease severity while influenza increases S. aureus infection and severity. Strains of influenza A virus also decrease phagocytic killing of S. aureus, leading to increased host susceptibility to bacterial superinfection (21). No other respiratory virus appears to share with influenza such a prominent role in predisposing to and increasing the severity of S. aureus pneumonia.

Risk factors for postinfluenza S. aureus CAP are undefined, but annual influenza vaccination is not recommended for half of the patients reported in our series under current guidelines (22). However, influenza vaccination is a major preventive strategy for influenza-associated pneumonia in older adults and in children 6–23 months of age (22,23). Moreover, studies have demonstrated that influenza vaccination can decrease the incidence of upper respiratory infections and lessen the need for antimicrobial drug use in healthy adults (24,25). Although these studies do not focus on specific bacterial complications, many studies have shown that influenza vaccination reduces overall pneumonia risk; thus one can reasonably assume that influenza vaccination would prevent secondary bacterial infections, including MRSA, in immunocompetent adults (24,26). Because information on antiviral treatment was not collected and most patients in this series sought medical care >2 days after illness onset, we could not assess the effects of early antiviral treatment. Although 1 study reported that early antiviral treatment of influenza with oseltamivir can decrease the incidence of lower respiratory tract complications, further studies are needed to determine whether early antiviral treatment of influenza can help reduce the risk for S. aureus pneumonia associated with influenza (22,27).

The incidence of MRSA CAP is unknown. In 2004, to monitor the incidence of MRSA, CDC initiated active population-based surveillance for invasive MRSA disease in 9 locations in the United States through the Emerging Infections Programs, Active Bacterial Core surveillance. These data will help characterize the further emergence of MRSA as a cause of CAP, guide public health interventions to prevent these infections, and provide information to guide empiric therapy recommendations. Currently recommended empiric therapy of CAP in immunocompetent adults with bacterial superinfection following influenza consists of a β-lactam or respiratory fluoroquinolone and may not adequately provide activity against community strains of MRSA (28). Whenever possible, physicians should obtain specimens (e.g., sputum or blood cultures) for diagnostic and antimicrobial drug–susceptibility testing to target therapy (28,29). Most patients in our series had severe disease and received broad-spectrum antimicrobial drugs, including coverage for resistant gram-positive bacteria. Whether initial inadequate empiric therapy plays a role in patient outcomes is therefore unknown.

Our cases suggest that empiric therapy of severe CAP during periods of high influenza activity should include coverage for MRSA, including among those without recognized risk factors for MRSA. In this regard, our concerns echo those of Martin et al. in 1959. Following these researchers' experience with the emergence of penicillin-resistant staphylococci during the 1957–58 Asian influenza pandemic, they commented "…during epidemics of influenza in localities in which staphylococci are known to be prevalent, all patients with signs of severe, potentially fatal influenza should—until proven otherwise—be diagnosed and treated promptly as cases of staphylococcal pneumonia caused by relatively antibiotic-resistant staphylococci" (1).

Mr Hageman is an epidemiologist in the Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Infectious Diseases, CDC. His research focuses on both community- and healthcare-associated antimicrobial drug–resistant staphylococci.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank Benjamin Estrada, Lisa Carollo, Jean Kirk, Melissa Tucker, Bette J. Jensen, David Lonsway, and Susan Webb for assisting in data collection and acquisition of isolates.

Top

References

  1. Martin  CM, Kunin  CM, Gottlieb  LS, Finland  M. Asian influenza A in Boston, 1957–1958. II. Severe staphylococcal pneumonia complicating influenza. Arch Intern Med. 1959;103:532–42. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Schwarzmann  SW, Adler  JL, Sullivan  RJ Jr, Marine  WM. Bacterial pneumonia during the Hong Kong influenza epidemic of 1968–1969. Arch Intern Med. 1971;127:1037–41. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chickering  HT, Park  JH. Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia. JAMA. 1919;72:617–26. DOIGoogle Scholar
  4. Fine  MJ, Smith  MA, Carson  CA, Mutha  SS, Sankey  SS, Weissfeld  LA, Prognosis and outcomes of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1996;275:134–41. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Johnston  BL. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus as a cause of community-acquired pneumonia—a critical review. Semin Respir Infect. 1994;9:199–206.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Four pediatric deaths from community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus—Minnesota and North Dakota, 1997–1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999;48:707–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Naimi  TS, LeDell  KH, Como-Sabetti  K, Borchardt  SM, Boxrud  DJ, Etienne  J, Comparison of community- and health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. JAMA. 2003;290:2976–84. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kazakova  SV, Hageman  JC, Matava  M, Srinivasan  A, Phelan  L, Garfinkel  B, A clone of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among professional football players. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:28–35. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. McDougal  LK, Steward  CD, Killgore  GE, Chaitram  JM, McAllister  SK, Tenover  FC, Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: establishing a national database. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:5113–20. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Vandenesch  F, Naimi  T, Enright  MC, Lina  G, Nimmo  GR, Heffernan  H, Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes: worldwide emergence. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:978–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Podewils  LJ, Liedtke  LA, McDonald  LC, Hageman  JC, Strausaugh  LJ, Fischer  TK, A national survey of severe influenza-associated complications among children and adults, 2003–04. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:1693–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Francis  JS, Doherty  MC, Lopatin  U, Johnston  CP, Sinha  G, Ross  T, Severe community-onset pneumonia in healthy adults caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying the Panton-Valentine leukocidin genes. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40:100–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility tests. Supplement M100-S14. Wayne (PA): The Committee; 2004.
  14. Ma  XX, Ito  T, Tiensasitorn  C, Jamklang  M, Chongtrakool  P, Boyle-Vavra  S, Novel type of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec identified in community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46:1147–52. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections among competitive sports participants—Colorado, Indiana, Pennsylvania, and Los Angeles County, 2000–2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:793–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Goslings  WR, Mulder  J, Djajadiningrat  J, Masurel  N. Staphylococcal pneumonia in influenza in relation to antecedent staphylococcal skin infection. Lancet. 1959;2:428–30. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Nickerson  CL, Jakab  GJ. Pulmonary antibacterial defenses during mild and severe influenza virus infection. Infect Immun. 1990;58:2809–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Sanford  BA, Ramsay  MA. Bacterial adherence to the upper respiratory tract of ferrets infected with influenza A virus. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1987;185:120–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Tashiro  M, Ciborowski  P, Reinacher  M, Pulverer  G, Klenk  HD, Rott  R. Synergistic role of staphylococcal proteases in the induction of influenza virus pathogenicity. Virology. 1987;157:421–30. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Davison  VE, Sanford  BA. Adherence of Staphylococcus aureus to influenza A virus–infected Madin-Darby canine kidney cell cultures. Infect Immun. 1981;32:118–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Abramson  JS, Lewis  JC, Lyles  DS, Heller  KA, Mills  EL, Bass  DA. Inhibition of neutrophil lysosome-phagosome fusion associated with influenza virus infection in vitro. Role in depressed bactericidal activity. J Clin Invest. 1982;69:1393–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Harper  SA, Fukuda  K, Uyeki  TM, Cox  NJ, Bridges  CB; Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, Prevention and control of influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005;54(RR-8):1–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gross  PA, Hermogenes  AW, Sacks  HS, Lau  J, Levandowski  RA. The efficacy of influenza vaccine in elderly persons. A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:518–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Nichol  KL, Lind  A, Margolis  KL, Murdoch  M, McFadden  R, Hauge  M, The effectiveness of vaccination against influenza in healthy, working adults. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:889–93. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bridges  CB, Thompson  WW, Meltzer  MI, Reeve  GR, Talamonti  WJ, Cox  NJ, Effectiveness and cost-benefit of influenza vaccination of healthy working adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2000;284:1655–63. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hak  E, Hoes  AW, Grobbee  DE, Lammers  JW, van Essen  GA, van Loon  AM, Conventional influenza vaccination is not associated with complications in working-age patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157:692–700. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaiser  L, Wat  C, Mills  T, Mahoney  P, Ward  P, Hayden  F. Impact of oseltamivir treatment on influenza-related lower respiratory tract complications and hospitalizations. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:1667–72. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Mandell  LA, Bartlett  JG, Dowell  SF, File  TM Jr, Musher  DM, Whitney  C, Update of practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:1405–33. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Bartlett  JG. Diagnostic test for etiologic agents of community-acquired pneumonia. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2004;18:809–27. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1206.051141

Table of Contents – Volume 12, Number 6—June 2006

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Jeffrey C. Hageman, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, Mailstop A35, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: January 04, 2012
Page updated: January 04, 2012
Page reviewed: January 04, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external