Volume 21, Number 1—January 2015
Research
Protocol for Metagenomic Virus Detection in Clinical Specimens1
Table 1
Purpose, method and supplier | Score† |
---|---|
Virus release/ homogenization | |
Ultrasonic (Sonopuls; Bandelin Electronic, Berlin, Germany) | +2 |
Dounce homogenizer (Kleinfeld Labortechnik, Gehrden, Germany) | +1 |
Qiashredder (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany) | 0 |
Trypsin (Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany) | +3 |
FastPrep Homogenizer (MP Biomedicals, Strasbourg, France) (longer homogenization time) | +4 |
Enrichment of virus particles | |
Filtration 0.2- µm filter (Merck-Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA) | +4 |
Filtration 0.45-µm filter (Merck-Millipore) | −2 |
Fractionated filtration | −1 |
Durapore polyvinylidene fluoride filter tubes (Merck-Millipore) | +2 |
With or without clearing centrifugation | +3 |
Taguchi-optimized centrifugation: 20% sucrose cushion overlaying 80% sucrose cushion and second clearing ultracentrifugation | +4 |
PEG-It virus precipitation (System Biosciences, Mountain View, CA, USA) | +1 |
InRichment Virus Reagent Kit I (Analytik Jena AC, Jena, Germany) | −1 |
Digestion/removal of host nucleotides | |
Turbo DNA-free (Ambion, Darmstadt, Germany) 30 min at 37°C with centrifugation | +4 |
RiboMinus Eukaryote Kit (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) | +1 |
Nucleotide extraction | |
QIAamp UltraSens Virus Kit (QIAGEN) | +2 |
PureLink Viral RNA⁄DNA (Invitrogen Life Technologies) | +1 |
QIAamp MinElute Virus Spin Kit (QIAGEN) | −1 |
RTP DNA/RNA Virus Mini Kit (Invitek, Berlin, Germany) | −2 |
RTP DNA/RNA Virus Ultra Sense (Invitek) | 0 |
NucleoSpin RNA II (Macherey Nagel, Dueren, Germany) | 0 |
NucleoSpin DNA (Macherey Nagel) | +2 |
Phenol chloroform extraction (Carl Roth GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) | +3 |
TRIzol LS reagent (Life Technologies) | +4 |
Amplification | |
N12 random primer | +3 |
N10 random primer | +2 |
WTA‡ | +3 |
WGA | 0 |
K primer‡ (7) | +3 |
3′ locked random primer(8) | +1 |
*WTA, whole transcriptome amplification; WGA, whole genome amplification.
†For every relative quantification result that increased the ratio between host and virus nucleic acids, 1 point was assigned (maximum +4 points if the method led to a better detectability for all 4 viruses). For every decrease, 1 point was subtracted (minimum −4 points).
‡WTA and K primer showed similar results. However, when we considered the lower costs and ease of handling of K primers,
we used K primers for this protocol.
References
- Fauci AS, Morens DM. The perpetual challenge of infectious diseases. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:454–61. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jones KE, Patel NGN, Levy MA, Storeygard A, Balk D, Gittleman JL, Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature. 2008;451:990–3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- He B, Li Z, Yang F, Zheng J, Feng Y, Guo H, Virome profiling of bats from Myanmar by metagenomic analysis of tissue samples reveals more novel mammalian viruses. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61950. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Baker KS, Leggett RM, Bexfield NH, Alston M, Daly G, Todd S, Metagenomic study of the viruses of African straw-colored fruit bats: detection of a chiropteran poxvirus and isolation of a novel adenovirus. Virology. 2013;441:95–106. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nakamura S, Yang C-S, Sakon N, Ueda M, Tougan T, Yamashita A, Direct metagenomic detection of viral pathogens in nasal and fecal specimens using an unbiased high-throughput sequencing approach. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e4219. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whon TW, Kim M-S, Roh SW, Shin N-R, Lee H-W, Bae J-W. Metagenomic characterization of airborne viral DNA diversity in the near-surface atmosphere. J Virol. 2012;86:8221–31. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stang A, Korn K. Characterization of virus isolates by particle-associated nucleic acid PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:716–20. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Clem AL, Sims J, Telang S, Eaton JW, Chesney J. Virus detection and identification using random multiplex (RT)-PCR with 3′-locked random primers. Virol J. 2007;4:65. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- King AM, Adams MJ, Carstens EB, Ninth L. Report of the international committee on taxonomy of viruses. San Diego: Elsevier Academic Press; 2011.
- Tidona CA, Darai G. The Springer index of viruses. Berlin: Springer; 2001.
- Kohl C, Lesnik R, Brinkmann A, Ebinger A, Radonić A, Nitsche A, Isolation and characterization of three mammalian orthoreoviruses from European bats. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e43106. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taguchi G. Introduction to quality engineering : designing quality into products and processes. Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organization; 1986.
- Bustin SA, Benes V, Garson JA, Hellemans J, Huggett J, Kubista M, The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments. Clin Chem. 2009;55:611–22. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schulze M, Nitsche A, Schweiger B, Biere B. Diagnostic approach for the differentiation of the pandemic influenza A(H1N1)v virus from recent human influenza viruses by real-time PCR. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e9966. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schroeder K, Nitsche A. Multicolor, multiplex real-time PCR assay for the detection of human-pathogenic poxviruses. Mol Cell Probes. 2010;24:110–3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kurth A. Possible biohazard risk from infectious tissue and culture cells preserved with RNAlater. Clin Chem. 2007;53:1389–90. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schipper J, Chanson JS, Chiozza F, Cox NA, Hoffmann M, Katariya V, The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: diversity, threat, and knowledge. Science. 2008;322:225–30. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marston DA, McElhinney LM, Ellis RJ, Horton DL, Wise EL, Leech SL, Next generation sequencing of viral RNA genomes. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:444. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kohl C, Vidovszky MZ, Mühldorfer K, Dabrowski PW, Radonić A, Nitsche A, Genome analysis of bat adenovirus 2: indications of interspecies transmission. J Virol. 2012;86:1888–92. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu Z, Ren X, Yang L, Hu Y, Yang J, He G, Virome analysis for identification of novel mammalian viruses in bat species from Chinese provinces. J Virol. 2012;86:10999–1012. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ge X, Li Y, Yang X, Zhang H, Zhou P, Zhang Y, Metagenomic analysis of viruses from bat fecal samples reveals many novel viruses in insectivorous bats in China. J Virol. 2012;86:4620–30. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Donaldson EF, Haskew ANA, Gates JE, Huynh J, Moore CJ, Frieman MB. Metagenomic analysis of the viromes of three North American bat species: viral diversity among different bat species that share a common habitat. J Virol. 2010;84:13004–18. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li L, Victoria JG, Wang C, Jones M, Fellers GM, Kunz TH, Bat guano virome: predominance of dietary viruses from insects and plants plus novel mammalian viruses. J Virol. 2010;84:6955–65. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Daly GM, Bexfield N, Heaney J, Stubbs S, Mayer AP, Palser A, A viral discovery methodology for clinical biopsy samples utilizing massively parallel next generation sequencing. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e28879. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
1Preliminary results of this study were presented at the Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases Meeting, January 29, 2014, Washington DC, USA.
Page created: January 05, 2015
Page updated: January 05, 2015
Page reviewed: January 05, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.