Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.
Mpox Vaccine Acceptance, Democratic Republic of the Congo
Skylar Petrichko
1, Jason Kindrachuk
1, Dalau Nkamba, Megan Halbrook, Sydney Merritt, Handdy Kalengi, Leonard Kamba, Michael Beya, Nicole A. Hoff, Christophe Luhata, Didine K. Kaba
2, and Anne W. Rimoin
2
Author affiliation: Jonathan and Karin Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA (S. Petrichko, M. Halbrook, S. Merritt, N.A. Hoff, A.W. Rimoin); Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (J. Kindrachuk); Kinshasa School of Public Health, University of Kinshasa, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo (D. Nkamba, H. Kalengi, L. Kamba, M. Beya, D.K. Kaba); Ministry of Health, Kinshasa (C. Luhata)
Main Article
Figure 2
Figure 2. Geography of overall mpox vaccine acceptance perceptions from a telephone phone survey about mpox vaccine acceptance conducted during December 2023–February 2024, by province, Democratic Republic of the Congo. A) Reported acceptance collapsed from the following 3 responses: Yes, for all populations; Yes, for children only; and Yes, for adults only. B) Reported nonacceptance by the response to: No, not interested. C) Reported lack of knowledge of mpox disease. All cartographic figures generated by using QGIS version 3.36.3 (https://qgis.org). Percentages are reported by province. Red outlines indicate provinces with histories of mpox cases.
Main Article
Page created: October 15, 2024
Page updated: October 23, 2024
Page reviewed: October 23, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.