Volume 8, Number 10—October 2002
THEME ISSUE
Bioterrorism-related Anthrax
Bioterrorism-related Anthrax
Surface Sampling Methods for Bacillus anthracis Spore Contamination
Table 2
Method | Dry swab |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. concordant samplesa |
No. discordant samplesb |
Correlation |
||||
Positive (%) | Negative (%) | Dry positive | Dry negative | rsc | p valued | |
Wet swab | 4 (14) | 15 (54) | 0 | 9 | 0.43 | 0.024 |
HEPA vacuum | 4 (14) | 5 (18) | 0 | 19 | 0.21 | 0.282 |
Wipe | 4 (14) | 5 (18) | 0 | 19 | 0.07 | 0.719 |
aTwo samples from the same location are concordant if both positive or both negative for Bacillus anthracis spores.
bTwo samples from the same location are discordant if one is positive and the other negative for B. anthracis spores.
crs denotes Spearman’s correlation coefficient between level of B. anthracis (CFU/cm2) obtained by using the dry swab method and the level of B. anthracis obtained by using the comparison sampling method.
dp value for null hypothesis of zero correlation.
Page created: July 19, 2010
Page updated: July 19, 2010
Page reviewed: July 19, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.