Volume 8, Number 10—October 2002
THEME ISSUE
Bioterrorism-related Anthrax
Bioterrorism-related Anthrax
Surface Sampling Methods for Bacillus anthracis Spore Contamination
Table 3
Methods compared | No. samples | No. concordant samplesa |
No. discordant samplesb |
Cohen’s Kappa | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive (%) | Negative (%) | Positive method | Positive method | |||
Wet swab vs. wipe | 67 | 35 (52) | 8 (12) | Wet swab = 1 | Wipe = 23 | 0.24 |
Wet swab vs. HEPA vacuum | 58 | 27 (47) | 10 (17) | Wet swab = 0 | HEPA vacuum = 21 | 0.31 |
Wipe vs. HEPA vacuum | 58 | 44 (76) | 5 (9) | Wipe = 5 | HEPA vacuum = 4 | 0.43 |
aTwo samples from the same location are concordant if both positive or both negative for presence of Bacillus anthracis spores.
bTwo samples from the same location are discordant if one is positive and the other negative for presence of B. anthracis spores.
Page created: July 19, 2010
Page updated: July 19, 2010
Page reviewed: July 19, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.